queue container?
Timon Gehr
timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Wed Oct 26 09:35:32 PDT 2011
On 10/26/2011 04:36 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:13:06 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
> <gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It should have both shared and unshared implementations of methods to
>> be a full-fledged container.
>
> Maybe, maybe not.
>
> I'm reluctant to add a copy of all functions to the containers just to
> support shared. We don't have a const or inout equivalent for shared.
>
Copying all the methods and marking them with shared does not make the
code thread safe. The shared and unshared versions would have to be
different anyways. There is no way do get something that relates to
shared/unshared as const does to mutable/immutable.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list