Own type for null?

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 09:42:25 PDT 2011


Le 26/10/2011 09:20, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
> I agree. Null is a very common special-case value and overloading may
> be necessary based on that special-case value. Currently doing so
> means accepting any kind of typeless pointer (which is certainly not
> desirable).
>

+1 for me ! And +1 for non nullable types.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list