compile-time explicitness

Jonathan M Davis jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Fri Sep 23 11:50:22 PDT 2011


On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:06 Gor F. Gyolchanyan wrote:
> Thank you so much for an objective reply! Of course i realize, that there
> are more important issues with DMD (i recently suggested not to implement
> enhancement requests to free up time to fix bugs). What i suggest is, as
> you correctly noticed, a very big task and i realize that it's not gonna
> be soon. What i wanted to take away from this discussion is the general
> opinion of the idea to rethink the compile-time facilities of D in the
> future.

They work quite well overall. I think that if we want to find solid ways to 
improve them, we're going to need more code written using what we currently 
have. More experience is needed with the current compile time facilities of D 
to really figure out how best to improve them

- Jonathan M Davis


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list