Why do we have transitive const, again?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 9/23/11 5:27 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
> Haven't we already had enough complaints on the newsgroup about the
> problems with const? Are they all bogus or something?

Hm, this made me realize something. Nobody complained about D's const 
since a good while ago. Probably that's because many related bugs have 
been fixed - but we've still got a ways to go.

Andrei