Need 'this' to access 'opCall'? Was I trying to?

Mehrdad wfunction at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 26 10:13:52 PDT 2011


On 9/26/2011 9:40 AM, Trass3r wrote:
>> Well, it looks like having declared a non-static opCall makes the
>> automatically generated constructor for the struct unusable - which 
>> may or may not be a bug
>
> I do think it's a bug. Only a static opCall should interfere with the 
> constructor.
Yeah I agree -- should I file it as one?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list