Custom attributes (again)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-04-06 09:17, Kapps wrote:

> Secondly, from what I can tell it's an arbitrary key value combo. What
> would happen if you're working on a larger project and two unrelated
> libraries try to use the same attribute name to mean different things?
> With the module system this issue doesn't exist since you have to import
> it and can selectively/privately do so, but from what I understand the
> method you're proposing doesn't declare the attribute itself at all. Am
> I just misunderstanding this part?

The way I'm thinking of attributes is that they are declared, somehow, 
in a module. Since it's declared in a module it would have the same 
rules any other declared symbol, with the possibility to use a fully 
qualified name.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg