Custom attributes (again)
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 6 06:24:17 PDT 2012
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:04:58 -0400, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 April 2012 15:58, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Note that d and d2 have no annotations attached even though they are of
>> type D. Because the type isn't affected by annotations.
>>
>
> Just to clarify, typeof(d) and typeof(d2) (ie, both D's) are still
> annotated with foo, right? This is precisely how I imagine it to be.
Correct.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list