Precise GC

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Apr 7 19:59:15 PDT 2012


On 4/7/2012 7:58 PM, Chad J wrote:
> Hey, that sounds awesome. I think I geeked out a bit.
>
> Would this make it any easier to reference count types that can be statically
> proven to have no cyclical references?


It has nothing to do with reference counting that I can think of.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list