Precise GC

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 4/7/12 9:59 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 4/7/2012 7:58 PM, Chad J wrote:
>> Hey, that sounds awesome. I think I geeked out a bit.
>>
>> Would this make it any easier to reference count types that can be
>> statically
>> proven to have no cyclical references?
>
>
> It has nothing to do with reference counting that I can think of.

Nevertheless good food for thought. This is all very cool.

Andrei