dmd's linking order

[Artur Skawina]

On 04/11/12 20:30, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-04-11 16:59, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Jacob Carlborg<doob at me.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Could it happen that the linker arguments need to be placed first sometimes ?
>>
>> If it's a user-created library then maybe. The general rule on Unix is that dependent objects need to be listed before the object they depend on.  I think the linker only does a single pass. Optlink doesn't have this problem--it's way nicer in this regard.
> 
> That would be the only case where optlink is nicer :)
> 

Umm, "-( -llib1 -llib2 -)". 
But using the correct order would be the right solution.

artur