An idea to improve eponymous templates

[H. S. Teoh]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:31:11PM +1000, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Jacob Carlborg" <doob at me.com> wrote in message 
> news:jm66st$2d3f$1 at digitalmars.com...
> > On 2012-04-12 11:21, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> Doesn't it need to be explicitly marked as a 'mixin template' for
> >> it to be mixed in?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > No, I don't think that is forced.
> >
> > -- 
> > /Jacob Carlborg
> 
> Hmm.  I guess the 'template' keyword is always available. 
[...]

What about nested templates?

Or perhaps we can combine the keywords:

	template MyTemplate(T) {
		static if (SomeCond!T)
			alias T this template;
		else
			static assert(0);
	}

Clear, self-documenting, and unambiguous. :-)


T

-- 
"You know, maybe we don't *need* enemies." "Yeah, best friends are about all I can take." -- Calvin & Hobbes