compiler support added for precise GC

[Walter Bright]

On 4/16/2012 1:54 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:52:54 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> But we need to change the name early on to avoid conflicts. I don't think a
>> more generic name would be inappropriate, even if the GC is the only client at
>> first.
>
> Should have said "But we need to change the name early on to avoid confusion
> later", i.e. "why is this GCInfo template generating reflection info that the GC
> doesn't use?"


Not a bad idea.