compiler support added for precise GC

[Robert Clipsham]

On 18/04/2012 17:31, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-04-18 13:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:50:02 -0400, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you explain why .NET types are not by default serializable? All of
>> them have full runtime reflection AFAIK.
>>
>> I'm not using that as an argument, I'm genuinely interested.
>
> I'm wondering that as well.
>

 From my quick google I couldn't find a definitive answer, but:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4408909/why-classes-are-not-serializable-by-default-in-net

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serialization (reasons listed under Java)

-- 
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/