Objects on message queues of spawned processes

[Russel Winder]

On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 18:06 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
[...]
> The issue is that the meaning of (S) {} in non-template delegate 
> signatures has changed: Previously it was a delegate with an unnamed 
> parameter of type 'S', now it is a delegate with a parameter named 'S' 
> of a deduced type. I think that the second meaning is more useful and 
> more consistent, but YMMV. (You can name the parameter '_' or something 
> along those lines to express that it is not used.)

OK, so I missed the memo, my fault.

Is _ just a valid name that can be used in a conventional way, or is it
an unallocated variable?

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120419/f7b195be/attachment.pgp>