Objects on message queues of spawned processes

[Timon Gehr]

On 04/19/2012 06:23 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 18:06 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
> [...]
>> The issue is that the meaning of (S) {} in non-template delegate
>> signatures has changed: Previously it was a delegate with an unnamed
>> parameter of type 'S', now it is a delegate with a parameter named 'S'
>> of a deduced type. I think that the second meaning is more useful and
>> more consistent, but YMMV. (You can name the parameter '_' or something
>> along those lines to express that it is not used.)
>
> OK, so I missed the memo, my fault.
>
> Is _ just a valid name that can be used in a conventional way, or is it
> an unallocated variable?
>

It is a valid identifier.