D Compiler as a Library

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-04-19 21:54, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

> MIT's *much* easier to understand though. Boost has some real goofy,
> obfuscated wordings. Although it's *worlds* better in that regard than the
> completely impenatrable GPL or Creative Commons.

What I like about the Boost license is that it says explicitly that no 
attribution is needed for binary distribution.

The zlib/libpng license on the other hand says so implicitly.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg