Can we kill the D calling convention already?

[Iain Buclaw]

On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen <xtzgzorex at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
>>
>> Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so there
>> shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
>> If the assembler code is unportable across compilers, it's a developer's
>> mistake or intention.
>
>
> The point is just that: Right now I can write assembly that will work on
> GDC, LDC, and DMD on non-Windows. It will not work for DMD on Windows.
> Something has to change here.
>
> You're missing the point if you think this is a "developer mistake".
>

Is not just Windows, the DMD calling convention on Linux differs from
the system calling convention.  For example, some of the naked
functions in std.math returning floating point values assumes caller
clean up.  Where as the C calling convention is callee clean up.

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';