Can we kill the D calling convention already?

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 24-04-2012 16:39, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen<xtzgzorex at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
>>>
>>> Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so there
>>> shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
>>> If the assembler code is unportable across compilers, it's a developer's
>>> mistake or intention.
>>
>>
>> The point is just that: Right now I can write assembly that will work on
>> GDC, LDC, and DMD on non-Windows. It will not work for DMD on Windows.
>> Something has to change here.
>>
>> You're missing the point if you think this is a "developer mistake".
>>
>
> Is not just Windows, the DMD calling convention on Linux differs from
> the system calling convention.  For example, some of the naked
> functions in std.math returning floating point values assumes caller
> clean up.  Where as the C calling convention is callee clean up.
>

It just gets better and better! :)

-- 
- Alex