Random distributions in Phobos

[Jesse Phillips]

On Thursday, 26 April 2012 at 11:46:32 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> OK, thanks.  So to be clear: I should submit my proposed 
> changes as a pull request, making sure to include a and should 
> expect feedback after about 2 weeks ... ?

Good follow up, I actually forgot about the three types of 
submissions and yours being the second (bugs third).

The review processes is really for major additions or changes. 
You are suggesting an expansion on existing functionality.

In which case submission via a pull request before review is 
acceptable, the review is done by the Phobos maintainers instead 
of requiring whole community input. However once you have a pull 
request ready, I think it is good to post to the forum to give it 
more visibility.

I also think adding a bugzilla entry for the enhancement may also 
be welcomed (other opinions?). The pull request would then state 
it closes the bug.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/

As for response expectations, there can't really be. There is a 
good chance things will sit in the queue for some time, if it 
takes too long, then asking again I don't see as being frowned 
upon.