How can D become adopted at my company?

[H. S. Teoh]

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:31:32AM +0200, SomeDude wrote:
[...]
> The other thing that would make it attractive among the C++
> developers, would be the development of a lightweight, high
> performance, minimal library that doesn't use the GC at all.  Ideally,
> it would be compatible with Phobos. I bet if such a library existed,
> flocks of C++ developers would suddenly switch to D.

I know the current GC leaves much room for improvement, but what's the
hangup about the GC anyway? If -- and yes this is a very big if -- the
GC has real-time guarantees, would that make it more palatable to C++
devs? Or is it just because they have trouble with the idea of having a
GC in the first place?


T

-- 
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Dirk Eddelbuettel