Does D have too many features?

[Manu]

On 29 April 2012 23:00, Alex Rønne Petersen <xtzgzorex at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 28-04-2012 23:18, SomeDude wrote:
>
>> Yeah, but core language AA are so useful it would be a MAJOR mistake to
>> remove them. In Python too, you could put the AA in the libraries. Yet
>> everybody uses the AA that are in the language.
>>
>> Where I DO agree with you is, Phobos should be a two level library, i.e
>> a minimalistic library, with about the same feature set as the standard
>> C library + multithreading, and a superset with the full range of
>> features (ranges, algorithms, etc). I've already advocated it somewhere
>> else.
>>
>
> Let's get a standard package manager that we either advocate on dlang.orgor include in the releases before we start talking about reducing the
> amount of modules in Phobos.


Oh hell yes! I have exciting dreams of something like this every other
night ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120430/5f7114d3/attachment.html>