std.d.lexer requirements

[Dmitry Olshansky]

On 07-Aug-12 01:48, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-08-06 22:26, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>
>> No.
>>
>> And doing Tokens as special comment token is frankly bad idea. See
>> Walter's comments in this thread.
>>
>> Also e.g. For compiler only DDoc ones are ever useful, not so for IDE.
>> Filtering them out later is inefficient, as it would be far better not
>> to create them in the first place.
>
> The Eclipse plugin Descent can show formatted DDoc comments.
>
I've meant that IDE may be interested in more then just DDoc, at least 
to highlight things properly.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky