The review of std.hash package

[Johannes Pfau]

Am Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:16:40 +0000 (UTC)
schrieb travert at phare.normalesup.org (Christophe Travert):

> If it where me, I would have the presently reviewed module
> std.hash.hash be called std.hash.digest, and leave room here for
> regular hash functions. In any case, I think regular hash HAVE to be
> in a std.hash module or package, because people looking for a regular
> hash function will look here first.
> 
> 

std.hash.digest doesn't sound too bad. We could have std.hash.func (or
a better named module ;-) for general hash functions later.