The review of std.hash package

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Wed Aug 8 15:47:04 PDT 2012


On 8/8/12 4:34 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I say just keep at simple and leave it at std.hash. It's plenty clear IMHO.

Not clear to quite a few of us. IMHO it just makes us seem (to the 
larger community) clever about a petty point. There's plenty of other 
better names, and std.digest is very adequate.

Andrei




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list