Function pointers/delegates default args were stealth removed?

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Aug 26 21:00:50 PDT 2012


On 8/26/2012 8:49 PM, Chris Cain wrote:
> If I may, here's my suggestion on how everything could work (and I think should
> be doable) ... basically, it would be part of the type, but functions with the
> same parameters regardless of defaults would be implicitly convertible to one
> another:

What happens with the name mangling? What about overloading? template type 
deduction? type specialization? type equivalence? type covariance?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list