Function pointers/delegates default args were stealth removed?

[Timon Gehr]

On 08/27/2012 12:32 PM, Manu wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 11:28, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com
> <mailto:newshound2 at digitalmars.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 8/27/2012 1:08 AM, Manu wrote:
>
>
>         Also, I think it could be fixed so the scenario in the bug
>         report worked as
>         expected (I still don't understand why it did't work in the
>         first place).
>
>
>     Because the two types were considered to be the same, only different.
>
>
> And how was that a problem? They never interacted in the example, the
> assignments were totally separate, they shouldn't have been confused.
> Just speculating, but it just looks like the type was misrepresented
> when it was looked up from a map by name or something, and matched the
> wrong cached definition... or something along those lines.
> It looks like a bug exposed from implementation detail, I can't see
> anything in the bug report that shouldn't theoretically work fine.
> ...

+1.