Function pointers/delegates default args were stealth removed?
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Wed Aug 29 02:59:57 PDT 2012
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:40:45 Manu wrote:
> I've conceded that I don't mind changing my code, if a satisfactory
> alternative exists (it doesn't currently). Also, I'd like to have some
> notice that I need to make some time to change the code, and the
> opportunity to work it into my schedule.
> Surely that's not unreasonable.
Ideally, something which is going to be deprecated is first scheduled for
deprecation (and marked as such in both the changelog and documentation) and
then later deprecated, giving programmer's time to change their code first. It
almost always works that way with druntime and Phobos, but I don't think that
we necessarily do as good a job with the compiler. Frequently the situation is
that people on the newsgroup know fullwell that a feature is going to be
deprecated (e.g. delete), but that's not well communicated outside of this
group, and for some reason, the to-be-deprecated items just don't get
deprecated even though it's been definitively decided that they will be at some
point.
In this particular case, it was viewed as a bug fix, and bug fixes break code
all the time (especially accepts-invalid bugs), so no effort was made to
indicate that a feature was going away (i.e. it was viewed as feature being
fixed rather than a feature going away, so no notification beyond the bugfix in
the changelog was given). Obviously, this was not handled in the best way, as
this thread has shown. But stuff that's actually viewed as being deprecated
generally is handled much better.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list