@property needed or not needed?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, December 02, 2012 12:36:53 Artur Skawina wrote:
> [1] If you think the required '()' in UFCS chains look ugly, you're right,
> but the right fix isn't to butcher the language.

I agree, but those who think that seem to be outnumbered by those who don't 
want to have to use the parens - particularly with functions which already 
require a template argument.

- Jonathan M Davis