Deprecated Library Functions / Methods

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 02:10:57 PST 2012


On Monday, 3 December 2012 at 08:37:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/3/2012 6:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting 
>>> the revamp
>>> in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let 
>>> std.xml wither
>>> and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.
>>
>> Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because 
>> the
>> correct name was already taken by something broken.
>
> So call it xmlex like Microsoft does. The exact name isn't that 
> precious.

It is.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list