Deprecated Library Functions / Methods

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 08:04:51 PST 2012


On Monday, 3 December 2012 at 15:56:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Calling it
> std.xml2, std.xml3, etc is easy to understand and to find, it's
> short and future proof

Yes. And if we also do std.xml1 then going to 2 won't seem weird.

We've had version discussions before, both here and on project 
downloads like that one DIP. The easiest solution for libraries, 
old projects, and end users is to just stick a number in the name.

Easy, obvious, functional.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list