@property needed or not needed?

Araq rumpf_a at gmx.de
Tue Dec 4 10:16:06 PST 2012


On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 16:24:27 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
> Isn't it possible to have parentheses optional only for UFCS?
>

This is exactly what Nimrod does. ;-) The () can also be omitted 
in calls used as a statement (not as an expression).

BTW Nimrod calls it "method call syntax"; there is hardly 
anything "uniform" in having the first argument in a special 
position...


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list