@property needed or not needed?
Araq
rumpf_a at gmx.de
Tue Dec 4 10:16:06 PST 2012
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 16:24:27 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
> Isn't it possible to have parentheses optional only for UFCS?
>
This is exactly what Nimrod does. ;-) The () can also be omitted
in calls used as a statement (not as an expression).
BTW Nimrod calls it "method call syntax"; there is hardly
anything "uniform" in having the first argument in a special
position...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list