@property needed or not needed?

Araq rumpf_a at gmx.de
Tue Dec 4 12:52:57 PST 2012


On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 16:24:27 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
> Isn't it possible to have parentheses optional only for UFCS?

That's exactly what Nimrod does ;-). It also allows to leave out 
the () for calls used as a statement (not as an expression).

BTW Nimrod calls it "method call syntax" as there is hardly 
anything "uniform" about putting the first argument in a special 
position.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list