@property needed or not needed?
Araq
rumpf_a at gmx.de
Tue Dec 4 12:52:57 PST 2012
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 16:24:27 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
> Isn't it possible to have parentheses optional only for UFCS?
That's exactly what Nimrod does ;-). It also allows to leave out
the () for calls used as a statement (not as an expression).
BTW Nimrod calls it "method call syntax" as there is hardly
anything "uniform" about putting the first argument in a special
position.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list