named field struct initialization

[Tavi Cacina]

I like this syntax too. I think/hope that for static stuff it 
will be here to stay.

On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 16:25:12 UTC, Dan wrote:
> At the risk of being too persistent, curious as to the reason 
> for disdain for named field initialization syntax and talk of 
> its deprecation.
>
> - does it cause problems?
> - is it on the chopping block?
> - is this the best way to find out the status of a specific 
> issue like this?
>
> This was originally asked in the learn forum. I see benefits to 
> the syntax - but I may be off base:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/oetijisdqjgcuvfvojiy@forum.dlang.org
>
> An additional similar question:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/zknqlojefvccnbpmnvae@forum.dlang.org
>
> Any insights as to where this feature is going are appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan