Experimental Phobos modules?

[Pragma Tix]

On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 08:27:39 UTC, Alex Rønne 
Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we need a semi-formal process for experimental Phobos 
> modules. That is, modules that are slated for the Phobos review 
> process and/or eventual inclusion in Phobos but needs actual 
> field testing to work out a proper interface or implementation.
>
> (I'm assuming most people in the community think an 
> experimental package namespace in Phobos is a good idea.)
>
> Some people see the "etc" package as being this but I think 
> it's too poorly named. Something like "experimental" (or just 
> "exp") would be more sensible IMO.
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on how we might do this? Any 
> bikeshedding? I'm not really sure what the best way to go about 
> this is, so really, any input is very welcome.

Years ago I've suggested to introduce an incubator project.