New std.process revival

[Denis Shelomovskij]

10.12.2012 20:58, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
> On 10-12-2012 10:04, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
>> 06.12.2012 22:40, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I decided to take a stab at reviving the new std.process written by Lars
>>> T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer.
>>>
>>> The result is here:
>>> https://github.com/alexrp/phobos/tree/new-std-process-update
>>>
>>> I decided to extract the work into new commits because rebasing the old
>>> branch in Lars's repo was way too cumbersome after so many months (and
>>> that branch also had a lot of merge commits). The code is obviously not
>>> written by me; all I did was a couple of build and test fixes.
>>>
>>> It currently works on 32-bit and 64-bit Linux. It would be great if
>>> someone could take it for a spin on OS X, FreeBSD, and Windows to see
>>> how it fares there (I'm particularly worried that I may have broken the
>>> Windows build).
>>>
>>> Lars or Steven, would either of you be willing to go through the review
>>> process with this module? I sent the druntime changes upstream a while
>>> back, so the Phobos changes are really all that remain in order to have
>>> it included.
>>>
>>
>> Please, confirm that such std.process implementation and its
>> functionality (process and threads listing etc., all what you have in
>> .Net once finished) is not needed:
>> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/k8v45g$15o6$1@digitalmars.com
>>
>
> I don't follow?
>

What is your question?
I already wrote all my reasons in "[RFC] Modules for processes 
manipulation" thread linked above. Nobody was interested in. So I want 
to be sure my variant is unneeded not just accidentally missed. If I'm 
the only person here who would like to see at least every option .Net 
Framework offer for process manipulation it's OK and I will stop asking 
about it.

-- 
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij