the Disruptor framework vs The Complexities of Concurrency

Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.olsh at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 00:09:37 PST 2012


12/12/2012 6:00 AM, Nick B пишет:
> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 23:04:56 UTC, Nick B wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 20:08:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 12/9/12 10:58 PM, Nick B wrote:
>>> [about the Disruptor framework]
>>>> Would Andrei like to comment on any of the comments so far ??
>>>
>>> Sorry, I'd need to acquire expertise in Disruptor before discussing
>>> it. I found http://disruptor.googlecode.com/files/Disruptor-1.0.pdf
>>> quite difficult to get into because it spends the first page stating
>>> how good Disruptor is, then the next 3 pages discussing unrelated
>>> generalities, to then start discussing implementation details still
>>> without really defining the pattern. I had to stop there.
>>>
>>> Is there a more concise description of the pattern?
>>>
>>>
>
> Ok, does anyone consider that this pattern, though not well described,
> has any value ?
>
> Nick

It surely has.

I'd consider http://martinfowler.com/articles/lmax.html to be quite nice 
description as it helped me to decipher the most of details.
The paper itself lacks illustrative material, focuses too much on 
overcoming Java limitations and generally too terse with important (to 
me) details of the framework.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list