Next focus: PROCESS

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:04:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
wrote:
> I think it's good.
>
> But personally I'd expect:
>
> * master to be what you define as dev, because e.g. GitHub puts 
> master as default target branch when making pull requests. 
> Yeah, I know it's their quirk that it's easy to miss. Still 
> leaving less burden to check the branch label for both 
> reviewers and pull authors is a net gain.
>
> * And what you describe as master (it's a snapshot or a 
> pre-release to me) to be named e.g. staging.
>
> And we can as well drop the dead branch 'dev' then.

That sound also like a good plan to me.