Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)
David Nadlinger
see at klickverbot.at
Thu Dec 13 16:44:30 PST 2012
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 00:42:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> For 1., I would guess at most something like half an hour for
>> a large codebase
>> where the feature is used pervasively (you just keep
>> editing/compiling until
>> there are no more syntax errors), which is why I can't quite
>> understand the fuzz
>> you are making about keeping the feature. And even if they
>> cannot switch right
>> now, as the Remedy guys are obviously willing to use
>> experimental compiler
>> versions, can't they just use a patched version until they
>> have made the switch?
>
> Like any major user of a language, they want confidence in our
> full support of them. Asking them to use a patched or branch
> version of the compiler does not inspire confidence.
This is WHAT THEY ARE DOING ALREADY.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list