the Disruptor framework vs The Complexities of Concurrency
Nick B
nick.barbalich at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 01:28:51 PST 2012
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 08:09:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
> 12/12/2012 6:00 AM, Nick B пишет:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 23:04:56 UTC, Nick B wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 20:08:32 UTC, Andrei
>>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/12 10:58 PM, Nick B wrote:
>>>> [about the Disruptor framework]
>>>>> Would Andrei like to comment on any of the comments so far
>>>>> ??
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I'd need to acquire expertise in Disruptor before
>>>> discussing
>>>> it. I found
>>>> http://disruptor.googlecode.com/files/Disruptor-1.0.pdf
>>>> quite difficult to get into because it spends the first page
>>>> stating
>>>> how good Disruptor is, then the next 3 pages discussing
>>>> unrelated
>>>> generalities, to then start discussing implementation
>>>> details still
>>>> without really defining the pattern. I had to stop there.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a more concise description of the pattern?
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Ok, does anyone consider that this pattern, though not well
>> described,
>> has any value ?
>>
>> Nick
>
> It surely has.
>
> I'd consider http://martinfowler.com/articles/lmax.html to be
> quite nice description as it helped me to decipher the most of
> details.
> The paper itself lacks illustrative material, focuses too much
> on overcoming Java limitations and generally too terse with
> important (to me) details of the framework.
[Request again] Would Andre like to make any comment, especially
on the martin fowler article ? Others commenting here have said
that they consider that the pattern has some value ?
Nick
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list