the Disruptor framework vs The Complexities of Concurrency

Nick B nick.barbalich at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 01:28:51 PST 2012


On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 08:09:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
wrote:
> 12/12/2012 6:00 AM, Nick B пишет:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 23:04:56 UTC, Nick B wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 20:08:32 UTC, Andrei 
>>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/12 10:58 PM, Nick B wrote:
>>>> [about the Disruptor framework]
>>>>> Would Andrei like to comment on any of the comments so far 
>>>>> ??
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I'd need to acquire expertise in Disruptor before 
>>>> discussing
>>>> it. I found 
>>>> http://disruptor.googlecode.com/files/Disruptor-1.0.pdf
>>>> quite difficult to get into because it spends the first page 
>>>> stating
>>>> how good Disruptor is, then the next 3 pages discussing 
>>>> unrelated
>>>> generalities, to then start discussing implementation 
>>>> details still
>>>> without really defining the pattern. I had to stop there.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a more concise description of the pattern?
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Ok, does anyone consider that this pattern, though not well 
>> described,
>> has any value ?
>>
>> Nick
>
> It surely has.
>
> I'd consider http://martinfowler.com/articles/lmax.html to be 
> quite nice description as it helped me to decipher the most of 
> details.
> The paper itself lacks illustrative material, focuses too much 
> on overcoming Java limitations and generally too terse with 
> important (to me) details of the framework.

[Request again] Would Andre like to make any comment, especially 
on the martin fowler article ? Others commenting here have said 
that they consider that the pattern has some value ?

Nick


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list