Compilation strategy

[jerro]

> It's not as if phobos would be distributed that way.  And even 
> it if was,
> then there'd be an uproar and a fork of the project.

I don't think that the FSF would be to happy about adding a front 
end with DRM support to GCC, even if no encrypted libraries would 
be added along with it. Of course a fork without DRM support 
could still be added to GCC, but if support for DRM libraries 
became part of D, then this would cause problems when some people 
would choose to actually use this feature with their closed 
source libraries and those couldn't be used with GDC.