Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Tue Dec 18 08:16:24 PST 2012

Previous message: Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?
Next message: Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 12/18/2012 7:48 AM, bearophile wrote:
  Is this name clashing acceptable?

Yes.

Previous message: Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?
Next message: Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list