Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?
David Nadlinger
see at klickverbot.at
Tue Dec 18 12:42:41 PST 2012
On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 at 20:27:31 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> Many other programming languages aren't as conservative as C++.
> I thing the key point here is to have a tool to handle the
> refactoring automatically. It seems way easier to provide such
> a tool in D than in C++.
I think it's quite the contrary, due to mixin() and the extended
code generation capabilities of D. In comparison, the C
preprocessor is pretty limited, at least as far as the typical
use cases are concerned.
David
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list