Should compilers take advantage (abuse) of the new UDA syntax that has been accepted?

[Iain Buclaw]

On 18 December 2012 22:23, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> pushing out things that can't be done in any other way into gcc-proper.


One example of this are version identifiers specific to target
architectures.  Where I suggested each target D is ported to should define
it's own TARGET_CPU_D_BUILTINS macro, and each platform it's
TARGET_OS_D_BUILTINS macro.  Both of which are defined outside of gdc.

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121218/b143faec/attachment.html>