Javascript bytecode

Brad Roberts braddr at slice-2.puremagic.com
Tue Dec 18 17:57:50 PST 2012


On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> On 12/18/12 7:29 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Which right now suffers from some silly things like writefln not being
> > able to be made @safe, just because some obscure formatting parameter is
> > un at safe. Which is exactly how @safe was designed, of course.  Except
> > that it makes SafeD ... a bit of a letdown, shall we say? - when it
> > comes to practical real-world applications.
> > 
> > (And just to be clear, I'm all for SafeD, but it does still have a ways
> > to go.)
> 
> Yes, there are several bugs related to SafeD.
> 
> Andrei

Are the remaining issues at the compiler, runtime, or phobos levels (or 
what combination of the three)?  Are the bugs filed?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list