POD

[Maxim Fomin]

On Thursday, 20 December 2012 at 10:57:08 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic 
wrote:
> On 12/20/12, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
>> They can have functions.. in
>> which case they aren't POD types at all.
>
> Having regular functions doesn't change the state of PODs. 
> Having a
> ctor/dtor/postblit probably does though (you can no longer 
> safely do a
> memcpy).

How presence of ctor/dtor/postblit affect the POD (in a sense of 
changing structure size and alignment)?

>
> But AFAIK you can always rely on the field layout of a 
> non-nested D
> struct, so a D struct should mostly remain compatible to C 
> structs.

Agree, unless it is a non-static nested function struct which has 
hidden member.