Javascript bytecode

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 20 December 2012 at 01:41:38 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> Not exactly, I argue that having a bytecode standard is 
> useless. How a compiler works internally is fairly irrelevant.

Note that in the first place, bytecode discussion has started 
with the need of provide a CTFEable module that do not contains 
more information that what is in a DI file, as it is a concern 
for some companies.

Bytecode can solve that problem nicely IMO. You mentioned that DI 
is superior here, but I don't really understand how.