Javascript bytecode

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Dec 20 21:42:40 PST 2012


On 12/20/2012 1:30 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> Note that in the first place, bytecode discussion has started with the need of
> provide a CTFEable module that do not contains more information that what is in
> a DI file, as it is a concern for some companies.
>
> Bytecode can solve that problem nicely IMO. You mentioned that DI is superior
> here, but I don't really understand how.

No, it doesn't solve that problem at all. I explained why repeatedly.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list