Javascript bytecode

[Walter Bright]

On 12/20/2012 10:05 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 05:43:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 12/20/2012 1:30 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>> Note that in the first place, bytecode discussion has started with the need of
>>> provide a CTFEable module that do not contains more information that what is in
>>> a DI file, as it is a concern for some companies.
>>>
>>> Bytecode can solve that problem nicely IMO. You mentioned that DI is superior
>>> here, but I don't really understand how.
>>
>> No, it doesn't solve that problem at all. I explained why repeatedly.
>
> No you explained that java's bytecode doesn't solve that problem. Which is quite
> different.

Please reread all of my messages in the thread. I addressed this.