Javascript bytecode

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 07:03:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 10:05 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> No you explained that java's bytecode doesn't solve that 
>> problem. Which is quite
>> different.
>
> I did, but obviously you did not find that satisfactory. Let me 
> put it this way:
>
> Design a bytecode format, and present it here, that is CTFEable 
> and is not able to be automatically decompiled.

Optimized LLVM bytecode look like a good candidate for the job. 
Note that I'm not suggesting this as a spec, but as an example of 
possible solution.