Javascript bytecode

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 20:08:00 UTC, jerro wrote:
>> Optimized LLVM bytecode look like a good candidate for the 
>> job. Note that I'm not suggesting this as a spec, but as an 
>> example of possible solution.
>
> It's true that it couldn't be automatically decompiled to 
> something equivalent to the original D source, but it does 
> contain type information. Its human readable form (llvm 
> assembly language) is easier to understand than assembly.

Once the optimizer is passed, a lot of it is lost. It is easier 
to understand than pure x86 assembly, but it is clearly opaque.